Tag: ballot

  • Ohio Republicans trying to get voter photo ID on the ballot, enshrined in state constitution

    Ohio Republicans trying to get voter photo ID on the ballot, enshrined in state constitution

    Sponsor

    Ohio Republicans trying to get voter photo ID on the ballot, enshrined in state constitution

    Ohio Republican lawmakers are trying to get a constitutional amendment on the ballot that requires voters to show photo identification in order to vote.  

    Lawmakers in the Ohio House and Senate introduced joint resolutions this week to enshrine voter photo ID laws into Ohio’s constitution. 

    House Joint Resolution 9 was introduced by Ohio Reps. Adam Bird, R-New Richmond, and Heidi Workman, R-Rootstown. 

    Senate Joint Resolution 10 was introduced by state Sens. Jane Timken, R-Jackson Township, and Theresa Gavarone, R-Bowling Green. 

    “This is about fair and free elections,” Timken said. “Voters need to know that when someone goes to vote, that it is the actual person who is registered to vote, and we do that by photo ID. This is overwhelmingly supported, not only by Republicans, but Democrats.” 

    The Pew Research Center showed 83% of Americans support requiring photo identification to vote. 

    “If you want to rent a car, you want to go to a hotel, get on an airplane, you need to show photo ID,” said state Sen. Kristina Roegner, R-Hudson.

    “If you want to buy alcohol or even certain medicines, you need a photo ID. It makes all the sense in the world that when we’re talking about something as serious and as important as the integrity of our elections, that it would also require a photo ID.”

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.

    If an Ohio voter is unable to provide a valid photo ID in person on election day, the joint resolutions would allow a voter to cast their ballot provisionally and provide photo ID at the board of elections by the deadline for their ballot to be counted. 

    The resolutions require three-fifths approval to be placed on the November ballot. 

    “I think the voters will decide that they want to protect it,” Bird said. “It’s wildly popular.”

    Ohio law already requires citizens to provide photo identification before voting thanks to a bill the lawmakers passed in 2022 and took effect in 2023. 

    “We have some of the most restrictive election laws,” said state Rep. Phil Robinson, D-Solon. “This legislation is unnecessary.”

    A valid photo ID includes an unexpired driver’s license, state ID card, a passport, a U.S. military ID card, an Ohio national guard ID card, or an ID card issued by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 

    Ohio Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, said he hopes to pass the Senate’s resolution either June 10 or June 17.

    “(The joint resolutions are) in response to some voter integrity concerns that have been happening nationally,” McColley said. 

    McColley is running for the job of lieutenant governor in November, alongside Republican governor candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Ramaswamy has said Ohio must enshrine voter ID in the state constitution.

    “Voter confidence in our election system is lower than it’s been in a while, and I think it’s important that we offer the voters the opportunity …  to decide for themselves whether they want to put this in the constitution, offering it the highest possible level of protection to secure the system that they have in place to secure the fundamental right of voting … for generations to come,” said McColley

    Hawaii and Virginia had voter photo ID requirements laws, but those laws were repealed. 

    “When you see these kinds of examples happening in other states, it becomes imperative that we protect photo ID in Ohio by placing it …  in the Constitution,” Bird said. 

    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost brought forth six indictments for voter fraud in 2024 after receiving 600 referrals of alleged voter fraud from the Ohio Secretary of State. The indicted were accused of voting at least once between 2008 and 2020 despite not being U.S. citizens then. 

    “Election fraud is so very rare,” said Ohio Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood. 

    “I think this is an attempt by the Republicans to have an election go their way, because without doing something extraordinary like this, rather than just appeal to the voters on the basis of their policies, they’re actually limiting the amount of people that can vote because they see that as their path to winning.” 

    Robinson worries these joint resolutions could potentially take away early voting or mail-in ballots. 

    “I don’t see how that helps Ohioans be able to have their voice heard at the ballot box,” he said. 

    McColley, however, said there are no plans to get rid of early mail-in voting or absentee voting in Ohio. 

    Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on X or on Bluesky.

    SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

    Source: ohiocapitaljournal.com
    Author: Megan Henry

    Sponsor
  • Property tax repeal campaign behind goal as deadline for 2026 ballot approaches

    Property tax repeal campaign behind goal as deadline for 2026 ballot approaches

    Sponsor

    Property tax repeal campaign behind goal as deadline for 2026 ballot approaches

    Les Carrier gathering signatures to abolish Ohio property taxes in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    The organizers leading an effort to abolish Ohio property taxes are coming to a crossroads. By July 1, the campaign needs to decide if it wants to roll the dice and attempt to get on this year’s ballot or keep its powder dry and wait for another election down the road.

    Last month, Ax Ohio Tax President Brian Massie announced they’ve collected 305,000 signatures so far. That puts them on track to clear the statutory minimum for the ballot, but doesn’t account for rejections. To feel confident, the campaign really wants at least 620,000 signatures for their submission.

    They’re not on track for that.

    Organizers can keep gathering signatures for as long as they want. Once they submit them, though, that’s pretty much it. If the campaign falls short there’s a brief, 10-day window to make up the difference. If they can’t, any subsequent effort to make the ballot would have to start over from square one.

    “I want the citizens of Ohio to hear this,” Massie said. “They can rest assured that we will not stop until we get this amendment on the ballot.”

    He said the campaign will announce its plans sometime in the middle of June.

    Les Carrier gathering signatures for Ax Ohio Tax in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    Good news, bad news

    Common Cause Ohio Executive Director Catherine Turcer sees citizen-initiated ballot measures as a central part of our democracy, and she’s been personally involved in several initiative campaigns. While Turcer acknowledged it can be “challenging” to wish the anti-tax campaign well, she said the point of direct democracy is that’s it’s open to everybody.

    And there are some factors working in the campaign’s favor.

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    “We are going into really good signature gathering weather,” Turcer said.

    “We’re going into farmers markets and parades, Memorial Day weekend,” she rattled off. “I mean, you can start to think about the different festivals and different ways that people are out and about outside, which makes signature collection easier than, say, January.”

    Their signature total puts them in “decent shape,” Turcer said. It also doesn’t hurt that the pitch is straightforward: do you want to keep your property taxes or get rid of them?

    But the campaign faces significant challenges, too.

    Every ballot measure sees a vast number of signatures rejected over clerical errors, Turcer said. Information could be illegible or incorrect. Petition circulators could mix up signatures from multiple counties, potentially spoiling otherwise valid signatures. And the process of physically scanning all those documents for submission takes a really long time.

    “In many ways, this is about, can I submit the appropriate paperwork in a really specific way, in a way I have never done before?” she said. “And it’s easy to get caught up in the hurdles.”

    What’s more, the petitions themselves have a kind of shelf life. When elections officials go to validate signatures they’re comparing the petition to current information — not whatever was current at the moment the signature was made.

    Ohio’s governor, lawmakers, and grassroots organizers are all wrestling over property tax reform

    “It’s a good kind of rule of thumb,” Turcer said, “(to) say 20%, 25% of the signatures that we collected a year ago could no longer reflect where the voter now lives, and so they will not count in the total.”

    And that means there are risks in submitting this year, and risks in waiting until next year, too. Turcer said only the campaign knows the quality of the signatures they’ve collected so far, and she’d be shooting for a similar threshold to the one the Ax Ohio Tax campaign has in mind.

    Turcer could imagine going forward with less of a cushion — but not much less.

    “At least over 600 (thousand),” Turcer said, as the absolute minimum she’d be willing to submit.

    Ax Ohio Tax Regional Captain Sue Mazzarini gathering signatures in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    Campaign check-in

    About a week after Massie’s announcement, Les Carrier joined a handful of other organizers to gather signatures at a community event in Hilliard. The former city councilman called out passersby by name and had a minute to chat with every one of them.

    Carrier seemed energized by Massie’s update. Three hundred thousand signatures isn’t halfway from their goal, it’s halfway there. He used terms like “skyrocketing” or “snowballing” to describe interest in the campaign.

    To him, the math is pretty simple.

    “A $160,000 home in Old Hilliard now is worth $300 (thousand),” Carrier said. “Their taxes have doubled. Their income hasn’t. So, I mean, something’s got to give.”

    Counterintuitively, he said enthusiasm began growing after Gov. DeWine’s administration warned eliminating the roughly $24 billion property taxes generates each year would lead to dramatic increases in sales or income taxes.

    Carrier downplayed the loss in revenue — “Chicken Little is what I called it” — and said making up the difference would be simpler and fairer with consumption taxes.

    “Everybody consumes at a certain level, everybody pays, and it broadens the tax base from which everything’s drawn,” Carrier said. In contrast, with property taxes, “what you’ve done is you’ve narrowed it down to those that have worked to build up equity and build up home valuation, and now they’re being punished for it.”

    Consumption taxes, like sales or value-added taxes, are regressive, meaning they fall more heavily on those with lower incomes because those households spend a greater share of their income to get by.

    And although Carrier thinks the solution is simple, that doesn’t mean everyone is on board. Massie, for instance, was blunt about his plans for replacing revenue. “We’re not going to,” he said, insisting instead that lawmakers need to cut spending, and “start a DOGE” in Ohio, referring to Elon Musk’s failed federal cost-cutting effort.

    Carrier remains optimistic about the campaign’s chances of making the ballot this year, but he has no problem with waiting.

    “I think we could make it for this year,” Carrier said. “But my personal opinion, I haven’t talked to Brian (Massie) about it yet, is if we don’t make 600 (thousand), we just keep on charging into next year.”

    Suzi Remick, left, and Andrea Beeson speaking to Ax Ohio Tax organizers in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    Andrea Beeson and Suzi Remick signed the petition after speaking to Carrier, and both expressed concerns about property taxes pushing people out of their homes.

    “I feel bad for the aging people,” Remick said. “If they have to lose their homes, that would be horrible.”

    Ohio farms get a significant property tax break because their valuation is based on agricultural use, but Beeson still worries about farmers near her home in Madison County getting priced out.

    “Who do they sell to? Developers that can pay more than another farmer,” she said. “And now we’re getting houses and houses and houses and our schools can’t hold them all.”

    Beeson and Remick said they’re still weighing whether it’s a good idea to abolish property taxes. They signed the petition because they want to give the campaign a chance to convince them and then have the chance to decide if and when the measure appears on the ballot.

    “Right now, they don’t know how it would work, where the money would come from for schools and everything else,” Beeson said. “I want that option, and I want to see how they would do it.”

    Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.

    SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

    Sponsor