Tag: campaign

  • Ohio’s governors race features political newcomers promising rosy visions of the future

    Ohio’s governors race features political newcomers promising rosy visions of the future

    Sponsor

    Ohio’s governors race features political newcomers promising rosy visions of the future

    Ohio Democratic governor candidate Amy Acton, left. (Campaign photo). Ohio Republican governor candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, right. (Getty Images.)

    This November, Ohio’s two major parties are backing nominees for governor who’ve never held elective office before. The last time that happened on either side of the aisle was almost 100 years ago when Myers Y. Cooper represented the GOP in the 1928 election.

    Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and Democratic candidate Amy Acton both insist the contrast between them could not be greater, and for the most part they’re right. In both their priorities, biographies, and demeanor, they offer something very different to voters.

    But absent a political record to draw on, voters are left with what the candidates actually say to distinguish them.

    Billionaire businessman Ramaswamy emphasizes the success he’s had and hopes to share with Ohio voters.

    Physician and public health leader Acton sees echoes of her own struggles as a child facing homelessness in Ohioans barely making rent.

    The Ohio they’re promising, though? It looks pretty similar.

    Both say they’ll reduce housing costs, health care costs, and taxes.

    Ramaswamy’s “lower costs, bigger paychecks, better schools” slogan would fit comfortably on either candidate. Acton meanwhile says she’ll “make Ohio affordable again,” borrowing, intentionally or not, Donald Trump’s now ubiquitous MAGA construction.

    Acton promises an Ohio where “everyone gets a fair shot,” while Ramaswamy commits to “revive this quaint idea that we call the American Dream.”

    In their victory speeches following last week’s primary election the nominees zeroed in on the same core pocketbook concerns — the cost of housing, utilities, and taxes are all too high. And looking further down the road, voters worry schools aren’t delivering their kids the opportunity to get ahead.

    But while the campaigns agree on the diagnosis, they offer very different cures.

    Two Ohios

    Ramaswamy framed much of victory speech around the Ohio voters could wake up to following November’s election.

    Ohioans can wake up to lower utility bills because the state is producing more energy, as well as lower property taxes and income taxes “because it is your money, not the government’s.”

    Ohio’s students would be doing better in reading and math because they’re not “indoctrinated with victimhood psychology,” and housing costs would be on the decline because Ramaswamy’s administration is “cutting the red tape.”

    “We can wake up to an Ohio where we are more united because it is easier to connect with our fellow neighbors and to be united in a rising economic tide,” he said.

    “That is one Ohio where we can wake up to in November, and that is where I will lead this state if you elect me this November.”

    In contrast, he claimed if Acton is allowed to win businesses would flee “in droves,” taxes would increase by $21 billion, and public schools would continue “choking the success of our students.”

    But a Democrat doesn’t need to be in charge for businesses to leave the state. Ramaswamy’s “anti-woke” investment firm Strive Enterprises moved from Columbus to Dallas, Texas in November 2024.

    The purported tax increase Ramaswamy is alleging is driven by Acton’s promise to forgive medical debt. Ramaswamy’s campaign simply multiplied the average debt burden by the number of Ohioans with medical debt to arrive at a figure of $15 billion. But that’s not how Acton’s idea would work. Like a similar program in Illinois, the state purchases debt that has gone to collections for a tiny fraction of its face value. Illinois’ program wiped out more than $1.1 billion in debt with $10 million in state funding.

    Vivek Ramaswamy promises largest property tax rollback in Ohio history, but big questions remain

    In a statement, campaign spokesperson Evan Machan said, “This election offers Ohioans a clear choice: Liberal Amy Acton wants bigger government and more spending, which means higher taxes, while Vivek will fight for common sense policies that deliver lower costs, bigger paychecks, and better schools.”

    But Ramaswamy has been vague about how he’d fund his positive vision of lower taxes, utility bills, and housing costs.

    Think tank Innovation Ohio estimated reducing property taxes would cost $6.6 billion. Eliminating income taxes would be costly as well. In the 2025 fiscal year, they generated about $11 billion. With severance taxes already comparatively very low in Ohio, it’s unclear how the administration would promote energy production. If red tape is standing in the way of housing construction, it has gone unaddressed by nearly two decades of Republican leadership.

    “It doesn’t add up”

    On election night, Acton described a young couple from Clermont County that she’s talked about before on the campaign trail. They stretched to afford a home but then got hit with $300,000 in medical bills after having twins born premature.

    “And then it’s the groceries going up, and it’s the gas — we all saw it go over five bucks, right? Her electric bill goes up. Her property taxes go up,” Acton said.

    The family’s school district even cut back its kindergarten program, Acton added.

    “This is what I am talking about,” she said. “They are doing every single thing right, but it doesn’t add up, and that is why we’re fighting to help make Ohio affordable again.”

    To get there, Acton is proposing a working families tax cut — pairing an earned income tax credit with a child tax credit of up to $1,000. Acton’s campaign says a married couple with two kids earning $60,000 a year would get a $1,778 tax break. She also promises to “fully fund” public schools.

    Ohio Democratic governor candidate Amy Acton makes pitch for addressing health care costs

    The campaign isn’t explicit about how Acton plans to pay for those ideas, but there are hints.

    In an emailed statement, the campaign noted state lawmakers have “put the wealthiest Ohioans and corporations first for far too long,” and Ohio’s private school voucher program “is sending billions of Ohioans’ tax dollars to fund private schools with no accountability.”

    It’s unclear whether rolling back recent income tax cuts and the expansion of Ohio’s voucher program would accomplish everything Acton is promising, but they would be a start.

    Acton criticized Ramaswamy as out of touch and out for himself. She pointed to past comments in which he called Medicare and Medicaid “mistakes,” downplayed affordability as a “buzzword,” and said businesses prize foreign and first generation workers because Americans “venerat(e) mediocrity over excellence.”

    “My opponent says people are lazy and mediocre and not working hard enough,” Acton said. “Well, that is not the Ohioans that I know, and I know it’s not the Ohioans that you know. We are all working harder than ever.”

    Libertarian agenda

    Outside the major party face off is Libertarian candidate Don Kissick, who promises to “break the machine” and “restore freedom.”

    His campaign supports both the amendment abolishing property taxes and another protecting same sex marriage, should the U.S. Supreme Court someday overturn its prior ruling.

    Kissick wants to reduce government regulation of the marijuana industry, and strongly opposes Immigration and Customs Enforcement as “an unaccountable federal enforcement agency.”

    He contends those who are here illegally should have a “straightforward and clear path” to legal status, and be required to make a good faith effort toward that goal.

    Kissick’s platform seeks an end to what he terms “corporate bribery.”

    “For so long,” the campaign states, “there have been corporate contributions coming to politicians from regulated monopolies in utilities, healthcare, telecom, and insurance.”

    Kissick would also ban lawmakers from serving as lobbyists for five years after leaving office.

    Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky

    SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

    Sponsor
  • Property tax repeal campaign behind goal as deadline for 2026 ballot approaches

    Property tax repeal campaign behind goal as deadline for 2026 ballot approaches

    Sponsor

    Property tax repeal campaign behind goal as deadline for 2026 ballot approaches

    Les Carrier gathering signatures to abolish Ohio property taxes in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    The organizers leading an effort to abolish Ohio property taxes are coming to a crossroads. By July 1, the campaign needs to decide if it wants to roll the dice and attempt to get on this year’s ballot or keep its powder dry and wait for another election down the road.

    Last month, Ax Ohio Tax President Brian Massie announced they’ve collected 305,000 signatures so far. That puts them on track to clear the statutory minimum for the ballot, but doesn’t account for rejections. To feel confident, the campaign really wants at least 620,000 signatures for their submission.

    They’re not on track for that.

    Organizers can keep gathering signatures for as long as they want. Once they submit them, though, that’s pretty much it. If the campaign falls short there’s a brief, 10-day window to make up the difference. If they can’t, any subsequent effort to make the ballot would have to start over from square one.

    “I want the citizens of Ohio to hear this,” Massie said. “They can rest assured that we will not stop until we get this amendment on the ballot.”

    He said the campaign will announce its plans sometime in the middle of June.

    Les Carrier gathering signatures for Ax Ohio Tax in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    Good news, bad news

    Common Cause Ohio Executive Director Catherine Turcer sees citizen-initiated ballot measures as a central part of our democracy, and she’s been personally involved in several initiative campaigns. While Turcer acknowledged it can be “challenging” to wish the anti-tax campaign well, she said the point of direct democracy is that’s it’s open to everybody.

    And there are some factors working in the campaign’s favor.

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    “We are going into really good signature gathering weather,” Turcer said.

    “We’re going into farmers markets and parades, Memorial Day weekend,” she rattled off. “I mean, you can start to think about the different festivals and different ways that people are out and about outside, which makes signature collection easier than, say, January.”

    Their signature total puts them in “decent shape,” Turcer said. It also doesn’t hurt that the pitch is straightforward: do you want to keep your property taxes or get rid of them?

    But the campaign faces significant challenges, too.

    Every ballot measure sees a vast number of signatures rejected over clerical errors, Turcer said. Information could be illegible or incorrect. Petition circulators could mix up signatures from multiple counties, potentially spoiling otherwise valid signatures. And the process of physically scanning all those documents for submission takes a really long time.

    “In many ways, this is about, can I submit the appropriate paperwork in a really specific way, in a way I have never done before?” she said. “And it’s easy to get caught up in the hurdles.”

    What’s more, the petitions themselves have a kind of shelf life. When elections officials go to validate signatures they’re comparing the petition to current information — not whatever was current at the moment the signature was made.

    Ohio’s governor, lawmakers, and grassroots organizers are all wrestling over property tax reform

    “It’s a good kind of rule of thumb,” Turcer said, “(to) say 20%, 25% of the signatures that we collected a year ago could no longer reflect where the voter now lives, and so they will not count in the total.”

    And that means there are risks in submitting this year, and risks in waiting until next year, too. Turcer said only the campaign knows the quality of the signatures they’ve collected so far, and she’d be shooting for a similar threshold to the one the Ax Ohio Tax campaign has in mind.

    Turcer could imagine going forward with less of a cushion — but not much less.

    “At least over 600 (thousand),” Turcer said, as the absolute minimum she’d be willing to submit.

    Ax Ohio Tax Regional Captain Sue Mazzarini gathering signatures in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    Campaign check-in

    About a week after Massie’s announcement, Les Carrier joined a handful of other organizers to gather signatures at a community event in Hilliard. The former city councilman called out passersby by name and had a minute to chat with every one of them.

    Carrier seemed energized by Massie’s update. Three hundred thousand signatures isn’t halfway from their goal, it’s halfway there. He used terms like “skyrocketing” or “snowballing” to describe interest in the campaign.

    To him, the math is pretty simple.

    “A $160,000 home in Old Hilliard now is worth $300 (thousand),” Carrier said. “Their taxes have doubled. Their income hasn’t. So, I mean, something’s got to give.”

    Counterintuitively, he said enthusiasm began growing after Gov. DeWine’s administration warned eliminating the roughly $24 billion property taxes generates each year would lead to dramatic increases in sales or income taxes.

    Carrier downplayed the loss in revenue — “Chicken Little is what I called it” — and said making up the difference would be simpler and fairer with consumption taxes.

    “Everybody consumes at a certain level, everybody pays, and it broadens the tax base from which everything’s drawn,” Carrier said. In contrast, with property taxes, “what you’ve done is you’ve narrowed it down to those that have worked to build up equity and build up home valuation, and now they’re being punished for it.”

    Consumption taxes, like sales or value-added taxes, are regressive, meaning they fall more heavily on those with lower incomes because those households spend a greater share of their income to get by.

    And although Carrier thinks the solution is simple, that doesn’t mean everyone is on board. Massie, for instance, was blunt about his plans for replacing revenue. “We’re not going to,” he said, insisting instead that lawmakers need to cut spending, and “start a DOGE” in Ohio, referring to Elon Musk’s failed federal cost-cutting effort.

    Carrier remains optimistic about the campaign’s chances of making the ballot this year, but he has no problem with waiting.

    “I think we could make it for this year,” Carrier said. “But my personal opinion, I haven’t talked to Brian (Massie) about it yet, is if we don’t make 600 (thousand), we just keep on charging into next year.”

    Suzi Remick, left, and Andrea Beeson speaking to Ax Ohio Tax organizers in Hilliard. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)

    Andrea Beeson and Suzi Remick signed the petition after speaking to Carrier, and both expressed concerns about property taxes pushing people out of their homes.

    “I feel bad for the aging people,” Remick said. “If they have to lose their homes, that would be horrible.”

    Ohio farms get a significant property tax break because their valuation is based on agricultural use, but Beeson still worries about farmers near her home in Madison County getting priced out.

    “Who do they sell to? Developers that can pay more than another farmer,” she said. “And now we’re getting houses and houses and houses and our schools can’t hold them all.”

    Beeson and Remick said they’re still weighing whether it’s a good idea to abolish property taxes. They signed the petition because they want to give the campaign a chance to convince them and then have the chance to decide if and when the measure appears on the ballot.

    “Right now, they don’t know how it would work, where the money would come from for schools and everything else,” Beeson said. “I want that option, and I want to see how they would do it.”

    Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.

    SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

    Sponsor